0
0
0
Outstanding Service    Fair Treatment    Competitive Pricing  
Strong Capital Base      Rebate of Profits  
 
- DTN Headline News
Senators: More Cash Cattle Trade Needed
By Chris Clayton
Monday, January 24, 2022 5:00AM CST

OMAHA (DTN) -- A pair of senators are making clear they don't want to rework their cattle markets legislation after the American Farm Bureau Federation changed its policy earlier this month to oppose any mandates that would require packers to buy more cattle through negotiated cash trades.

The American Farm Bureau Federation on Friday declared its support for S. 3229, the Cattle Price Discovery and Transparency Act, as long as senators drop the biggest element in the bill -- the establishment of mandatory minimum negotiated cash sales for fed cattle.

The bill, led by Sens. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, was a compromise introduced in mid-November that would require USDA to set regional mandatory minimum cash trade for fed cattle purchased by packers for slaughter. The bill also has other provisions that would require USDA to release daily base price information for cattle purchased through formula contracts. Other provisions would expedite the reporting of carcass weights and create a cattle contract library of alternative marketing agreements at USDA as well.

Still, the central language in the Cattle Price Discovery and Transparency Act would require packers to buy an undetermined minimum level of cattle through cash trades within 14 days of slaughter. USDA would set the regions and minimum purchase volumes.

Delegates at the AFBF annual meeting on Jan. 11 voted to change their policy book to oppose government mandates for any livestock slaughter facility to purchase a set percentage of live animal supply via cash bids. The group also maintained language, though, stating, "Any government effort to increase the amount of negotiated sales should be respectful of regional differences."

AFBF delegates were divided by their own regional differences regarding how cattle are sold to packers in individual states. Delegates from the Midwest and Southeast were more supportive of mandates on cash trade, while delegates from states such as Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas with high percentages of formula contracts eventually won out.

Farm Bureau's annual meeting also had speakers questioning the benefits of cash trade mandates, including John Newton, the chief economist for the ranking Republican on the Senate Agriculture Committee, and Stephen Koontz, a livestock marketing extension economist at Colorado State University.

"More cash trade will not result in better prices or change the market situation we've been in since 2016," Koontz said at the AFBF meeting on Jan. 10. Koontz added, "There are people who argue having more packers to bid on your cattle will raise prices. That's baloney."

AFBF came out on Friday stating the group "supports robust negotiated sales" but opposed the government mandates.

"We support the majority of this legislation, but we cannot support mandatory cash sales," said Zippy Duvall, president of AFBF, in a statement. "We are committed to working with the sponsors of this bill to make revisions to ensure it aligns with the priorities outlined by our membership."

Fischer, a cattle rancher in Nebraska's Sandhills, pointed out Farm Bureau "reiterated its support for our efforts to ensure every segment of the cattle market can succeed." Fischer then noted Farm Bureau's membership was divide on how to handle negotiated cash trade.

"Though there are differences of opinion with their own organization on a solution, family farmers and ranchers have been clear," Fischer said. "Robust negotiated cash sales are integral to facilitating price discovery in the market."

Fischer added that her bill has bipartisan support, backed by 15 other senators, including lead co-sponsors, Grassley and Sens Jon Tester, D-Mont., and Ron Wyden, D-Ore. All told, there are seven Republican and nine Democrats backing the bill, of which 10 are members of the Senate Agriculture Committee.

Grassley made a point of declaring that the "complete" bill is needed to improve market access for independent cattle producers. Grassley stated he is "pleased to see that the American Farm Bureau is reaffirming their support for the goals of our bipartisan bill to improve competition and market access for livestock producers." Grassley said he is confident the bill would advance out of the Senate Agriculture Committee if it were brought up for a vote.

However, Grassley said he based the bill "on what I'm hearing directly from Iowa's independent cattle producers." Grassley added, "When packers limit their ability to negotiate a fair price, especially when consumers are seeing prices skyrocket at the grocery store, the market clearly isn't working. I understand the cartel of four meat packers, which controls 85% of the beef market, is pressuring others in the ag community oppose this bill. However, I remain focused on providing the most complete solution to improve price transparency and market access to the independent producers I hear from each day."

So far, the Senate Agriculture Committee has not set any hearings or business meetings to discuss advancing the bill.

Chris Clayton can be reached at Chris.Clayton@dtn.com

Follow him on Twitter @ChrisClaytonDTN


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
Technically Speaking
Editorial Staff
Monday, January 24, 2022 8:26AM CST
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 1:35PM CST
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 1:35PM CST
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Thursday, January 20, 2022 10:59AM CST
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 8:48AM CST
Friday, January 14, 2022 6:49AM CST
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Friday, January 21, 2022 11:01AM CST
Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41AM CST
Friday, January 21, 2022 9:41AM CST
Minding Ag's Business
Katie Behlinger
Farm Business Editor
Monday, January 24, 2022 12:35PM CST
Saturday, January 1, 2022 4:50AM CST
Saturday, January 1, 2022 4:50AM CST
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Thursday, January 20, 2022 10:14AM CST
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 1:56PM CST
Friday, January 14, 2022 8:00AM CST
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Friday, January 21, 2022 4:50PM CST
Friday, December 31, 2021 12:07PM CST
Friday, December 31, 2021 12:07PM CST
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Monday, January 24, 2022 1:53PM CST
Monday, January 10, 2022 2:54PM CST
Monday, January 3, 2022 2:54PM CST
South America Calling
Editorial Staff
Friday, January 21, 2022 12:44PM CST
Thursday, January 13, 2022 2:47PM CST
Thursday, January 6, 2022 1:21PM CST
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:16PM CST
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 1:16PM CST
Monday, January 10, 2022 12:38PM CST
Machinery Chatter
Dan Miller
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:10AM CST
Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:10AM CST
Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:00AM CST
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Tuesday, January 25, 2022 4:08PM CST
Monday, January 24, 2022 4:06PM CST
Friday, January 21, 2022 4:06PM CST
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Friday, December 31, 2021 3:33PM CST
Friday, November 19, 2021 4:02PM CST
Friday, November 5, 2021 4:55PM CST
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN